work in progress
Autonomy 2 min System Scope: a team agreement and whoever owns priorities

⇄ A roadmap nobody may refuse is a queue

What you are asking for

A roadmap is agreed, then an important customer asks for an urgent adaptation. You propose adding it to protect the relationship.

What the system hears

If nothing is removed or renegotiated, the team can understand that both commitments are still expected in the same timeframe.

What that produces

A new request can be justified. The problem appears when its cost stays implicit: other work slips, a check disappears, or the load rises with no shared decision. Making the call visible lets you back the people who have to explain it. That holds for your own ideas too. A suggestion in a corridor can be heard as a priority if your role gives it weight; saying whether you are exploring or deciding removes that ambiguity.

The team’s mandate has to be concrete. Can they refuse a request outside the remit, propose another date, or ask for a decision? Who can commit spending, or change a promise made to a customer? A general statement about autonomy does not answer those questions.

The consequences sometimes go beyond the schedule. A bespoke adaptation can require lasting maintenance, training, or a support procedure. Those costs deserve examining before you confirm, without assuming they make the request a bad one.

If you support the team without holding the authority, help them prepare the options and identify who calls it. If you decide, take on the explaining to the parties involved. The team should not have to hide displaced work in order to look cooperative.

The decision

→ For a significant insertion, note what it displaces or the extra means it requires. Confirm the dates with the people concerned.
→ Have your own requests examined against the same criteria as everyone else’s, separating an idea from a commitment.
→ Agree a condition for revisiting. At the next review, compare the load and the effect observed to the original assumptions.

On a first attempt, apply this frame to a single request. Check that the team knows who can answer, and that the changed commitments were actually communicated.

From where you sit

To discuss

What did our last insertion displace, and who confirmed that change with the people affected?

Discuss this